Categories
AAA aortic dissection Commentary taaa tbad techniques TEVAR thoracabdominal aortic aneurysm visceral malperfusion

Moneyballing a Type II Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm


The innovation of sabremetrics in baseball management and finance as described in Michael Lewis’ wonderful book Moneyball wasn’t just the ability to quantify skill to predict outcomes, it was the ability to assemble that skill without overpaying. For a baseball team on a budget, spending all your payroll on a superstar makes no sense when you can get equivalent quants of skill in a statistical aggregate of no-name players with proven metrics. Rather than pay for an A-Rod, you can recruit, and pay for, 5 players that in aggregate, statistically achieve what you would get with a healthy A-Rod, so the thinking goes. How does this translate into vascular surgery? Can we arbitrage complication rates?

The open repair of type II thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms is a heroic endeavor, putatively best done by surgeons wearing cowboy boots, and classically comes with sobering complication rates that exceed 20% for death and paralysis. Is it possible to reduce this risk by subdividing this most enormous of cardiovascular operations into component parts?

The patient is a middle aged man in his 50’s who presented with a type B aortic dissection. His dissection flap spanned from his left subclavian artery to the infrarenal aorta. He was a long time smoker and had hypertension that was difficult to control, made much worse after his dissection. He had a moderate dilatation of his thoracic aorta, maximally 36mm and tapering to 35mm in visceral segment. There was a 4.9cm infrarenal AAA where the dissection terminated.

CTA at presentation

His chest pain resolved with blood pressure control and he was discharged, but in followup his thoracic aortic segment grew and his blood pressure worsened, never getting below a 150mmHg systolic despite multiple agents. CTA two months after presentation, showed growth of his TAA to 44mm from  36mm in two months  and the visceral segment showed that his dissection flap impinged on flow to the right renal artery. His AAA remained the same. He continued to have bouts of chest pain related to hypertension.

CTA at 2mo post presentation

Twenty years ago, the board answer would have been to replace the whole aorta. In young, otherwise healthy man who had been working in road construction up to the dissection, he would have been considered a candidate for a direct open repair of the type II thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm. From the landmark paper out of Houston by Dr. Svensson in 1993, open type II TAAA repair was associated with about a 10% death rate and 30 percent paralysis rate. Waiting a few months for the aneurysms to grow further in this patient, in the 90’s this patient would probably have ended up with an open TAAA repair. Good thing we have better options.

The goals of modern therapy are to treat the urgent indication while holding off repair of less critical segments of the aorta, and to do so in a way that each operation builds on the previous one.

This patient needed a left subclavian artery debranching and then TEVAR of his dissecting thoracic aortic aneurysm, and intervention on his right renal artery. We did this in one setting performing first a left carotid subclavian artery transposition and then percutaneous TEVAR from the left common carotid artery origin to the supraceliac abdominal aorta.

TEVAR with carotid SCA transposition

completion TEVAR.png

The completion aortography showed good deployment of the CTAG device from the left common carotid artery origin to the celiac axis origin. The false lumen was no longer visualized. The right renal artery which was narrowed was treated with a balloon expandable stent.

The distal thoracic aorta, the true lumen was constrained by a chronic dissection flap. It is here I gently dilate the distal thoracic stent graft with the hopes of eliminating the distal false lumen. This is different from the acute dissection where I rarely balloon.

The TEVAR was done percutaneously, minimizing the overall time in the operating room. The technical details of the transposition can be found in the excellent paper by Dr. Mark Morasch.

 

renal PTAS

When I do this procedure for acute dissection, I quote the patient a general risk of stroke, paralysis of about 2-5% and death of 1-2 percent for someone with low cardiopulmonary risk like this patient had. He recovered rapidly and went home post op day 5.

 

Followup post TEVAR

He at 6 month post TEVAR followup, CTA showed stablility in his thoracic aorta. in infrarenal AAA grew from 5.0 to 5.7cm between the 1 month CT and the 6 month CT.

6 month CTA imaging

The terminus of the stent graft excluded the false lumen in the thoracic aorta but also resulted in filling and pressurization of the false lumen beyond and can be seen as a 44mm lateral dilation of the visceral segment of the aorta which had developed in the 6 month interval since the TEVAR.
The infrarenal neck continued the dissection and had dilated to about 36mm, but was parallel for a good length above the AAA. I decided to treat the inrarenal aorta with direct transabdominal repair. This would allow me to fenestrate the aorta, and possibly prevent further growth of the viseral segment while reserving the retroperitoneum for the visceral segment repair if it came to it. The neck diameter was 36mm.

tube graftHis operation was performed via an anterior approach with the patient supine. A tube graft repair was performed expeditiously and included resecting the dissection flap up to the clamp. Care was taken to avoid injury to the renal stent. The proximal anastomosis went well – the dilated aorta yet had strong tissue strength. A felt strip was used to buttress the aortic side of the anastomosis. The estimated risk of paralysis was less than 1% and risk of death was less than 2%. The patient recovered uneventfully and went home on POD 5.

He did well in subsequent followup, having successfully quit smoking. He retired early on disability and was becoming more active, but the visceral segment dilatation was concerning. At 6 months post infrarenal AAA repair, he underwent CTA and it showed patent thoracic stent graft and infrarenal abdominal graft. The intervening visceral segment continued to enlarge and was now 46mm. The decision was to wait another interval 9 months to see if this would stabilize. The segment grew some more and was 49mm. He wanted to give it another 6 months and at that time, CTA showed further growth over 5cm, and he had developed some abdominal discomfort. He was taken to the operating room.

IMG_8659

A four branch repair of the visceral segment thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm was performed. The diaphragm was taken down and the stent graft was clamped as was the infrarenal tube graft. A premade Coselli graft was used to bypass to the right renal, SMA, celiac, and left renal in those order. The patient had a CSF drain for the case which was removed on postoperative day 2. He recovered rapidly and went home on postoperative day 6. His estimated risk of paralysis was about 2-5%, mitigated by a protocol centered on CSF drainage and blood pressure control. His risk of death was 5%. Telephone followup reveals the he is pain free at a month out and functional nearly at baseline.

This illustrates the notion that three smaller operations in an aggregate over three years achieved the equivalent of the single big open type II TAAA repair.

equivalence
Illustration on left from Svensson et al.

The idea is to make each step achievable -like coming down a mountain taking three days on well marked paths rather than base jumping off the summit.

Clearly, the patient was younger and a fast healer, and credit must also be given to the anesthesia/critical care team who see high acuity cases in volume every day and not every patient can expect to have such short stays and excellent outcome, but these are far more likely if operations are planned out in such a manner.

Reference

Svensson LG, Crawford ES, Hess KR, Coselli JS, Safi HJ. Experience with 1509 patients undergoing thoracoabdominal aortic operations.  J Vasc Surg 1993;17(2):357-36.

 

Categories
Carotid Journal Club

April 2016 Journal Club

Vascular Journal Club will be on April 19, 2016 at the usual location. Presenting will be:

Dr. Dimitri Virvilis –synchronous carotid and coronary artery disease

Dr. Max Wohlauer –neurorescue -please be prepared to discuss cerebrovascular anatomy

Dr. Roy Miler –vertebral translocation

 

Categories
Journal Club

March Journal Club -Peripheral Aneurysms

 

 

Categories
Uncategorized

My Innovations Coach Featured in Inc.com article

“Why Cleveland Clinic Believes It Can (at Least) Triple a $1.5 Million Investment in This Startup”

http://www.inc.com/ilan-mochari/cleveland-clinic-startup-tatara-vascular.html

Categories
Journal Club Uncategorized

February Journal Club -Venous Disease

February 16, 2016 630pm at Foundation House.

Presenters:

Dr. Mohammed Abbasi – joi150040 -Effect of a Retrievable Inferior Vena Cava Filter Plus Anticoagulation vs Anticoagulation Alone on Risk of Recurrent Pulmonary Embolism A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2015;313:1627-1635.

Dr. Keith Glover –PIIS1078588413005947 -Percutaneous Manual Aspiration Thrombectomy Followed by Stenting for Iliac Vein Compression Syndrome with Secondary Acute Isolated Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis: A Prospective Study of Single-session Endovascular Protocol. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2014;47:68-74.

 

Categories
VESS

Case presentation at VESS Winter Meeting 2016 at Park City

  
Dr. Francisco Vargas presents for Dr. Max Wohlauer our case report on managing SMA thrombosis post type B thoracic aortic dissection. Photo credit R. Kelso. 

Categories
Venous vte

The student is now the master: IVC filter removal is easy until it is not, then it is very difficult


The inferior vena cava filter when it first invented by Dr. Greenfield was a minimally invasive solution that offered continued caval patency. The options up to then were ligation of the inferior vena cava using sutures or with an implantable plastic clip. The use of these filters exploded over the past 15 years corresponding to increasing recognition of venous thromboembolism as a morbid complication, the increasing numbers of implanters, and the introduction of retrievability.

Removing filters is a serious business because leaving them in for life is not inconsequential. Typically, the period of time that the filter are required for protection exceeds the limits of retrievability recommended on the instructions for use. It is not generally understood that many filters can be retrieved years after implantation, but it is not as simple as retrieval within a few months of implantation which can be done in under 30 minutes. In patients like the one in the illustrations, several years after implantation, the filter comes out only with some patience and a little help from friends.

The IVC filter is embedded in the right sided wall of the vena cava and the hook would not engage. From a right internal jugular vein, wire access to the filter was achieved and an 18F x40cm sheath was placed through which a 12Fx50cm sheath was placed. Through this, a floppy glide wire was directed above the struts of the filter, and it curved around and snaked under one of the far struts.

This allowed me to snare the wire and bring that out.


I placed another wire through the sheaths and removed the sheaths which were around both the Glidewire which was wrapped, and the second wire which was through. The sheaths were then replaced over that second wire, giving me room to maneuver I inside the 12F sheath. The first wire was then retracted with modest tension and it succeeded in lifting the hook away from the wall, allowing me to snare the hook through the sheaths.


Once the top of the device was securely in the 12F sheath, the first wire was removed and the filter was removed.


The retrieval of an IVC filter device within the parameters of IFU (instructions for use) is like level one of a video game. Challenging for the novice, but eminently doable. The retrieval of these filters left in for years is more like level 25 of the same video game. The nice thing is having friends who can give you tips on defeating that level.

At VEITH symposium a couple of years ago, Dr. Paul Foley presented data and technical details on removing these filters, and this has been enthusiastically taken up by my partner Dr. Christopher Smolock who happened to be walking the halls the day of that case. His tip: “18F Sheath over 12F sheath, tilt the filter, and capture,” he said. “Wasn’t Foley your resident back at Columbia (in 2004)?” he added.

“Yes…” I replied.

“Now the student has become the master,” quoting Darth Vader. Which was fine with me because that made me Obi Wan Kenobi, which isn’t too bad. The great privilege of being a teacher is having that go around full circle. Or as Vader said, “The circle is now complete.”

 

Categories
VESS

VESS 2016 Winter Meeting

  
Drs. John Weber (CCF Vascular Residency class of 2015) and Rebecca Kelso (faculty) enjoying the pre-session high tea. Great vascular meeting for young vascular surgeons at the Canyons Resort, Park City, Utah. 

  

Categories
Carotid hypertension

A non-renal operation to lower blood pressure?

eversion 1

Our journal club today is discussing one of the many trials that have tried to validate endovascular renal denervation to control severe hypertension. One of the devices I was on trial for back in the 00’s was the CVRx Rheos trial which stimulated the carotid sinus using a surgically placed electrode and generator. While the approval trial failed in the US, it was approved in Europe and my observation of over 30 patients who had this at my center at that time was that it was effective. So effective that I believe many patients stopped taking their pills in exchange for electrical energy -some patients required at least once a year generator changes, often more, but they had normal blood pressures and less to none of the side effects of their medications which frequently exceeded 5 agents.

I have observed that on the carotid baroreceptor, which is shaped like an aneurysm by the way, there are paired vasovasorum in the pattern seen above. The only other time I have seen paired arteries is with a nerve. The baroreceptor nerves are very hard to see, but they are there and you can find them between these paired vessels.

The observation that the baroreceptor looks like an aortic aneurysm isn’t a silly one. The area of maximal wall tension is in regions of greatest curvature change and these, teleologically, would be the shape of a baroreceptor. The stiffening of these regions with atherosclerotic plaque would decrease the signal sent to modulate blood pressure and heart rate, and create a pathologic cycle of increasing pressures in response to increased vessel stiffness and vice versa. Just saying.

I began to wonder if restoring the elasticicty of these vessels and the shape of the baroreceptor would have a lasting impact on blood pressure. The operation is eversion carotid endarterectomy with sparing of Hering’s nerve.

Eversion2

The plaque can be removed without stripping the carotid sinus nerves, resulting in restoration of the sinus/baroreceptor complex.

eversion 3

This would result in bradycardia/hypotension, which I have observed in a percentage of my eversion endarterectomy patients. Cutting the nerves results in hypertension, and was the subject of a paper from Montefiore (reference).

However, the proximal ICA at the carotid bifurcation was mobilized circumferentially to facilitate its transection from the CCA at the carotid bulb. During this approach, carotid sinus nerve fibers derived from the glossopharyngeal nerve and innervating the carotid body within the adventitia of the proximal ICA were routinely divided (Mehta et al.)

In that paper, hypertension was seen in 24% of patients undergoing eversion CEA with denervation compared to 6% undergoing standard endarterectomy, and as an aggregate occured for a prolonged period of time:

hypertension graph

The hypotension and bradycardia that I observe in nerve sparing eversion endarterectomy appears to be transient, but it is my unstudied observation that some of these patients subsequently have a lower need for blood pressure medication. This will deserve further study, but may explain the variable results of denervation procedures aiming to control hypertension. To some extent, all blood vessels are innervated and provide an aggregate signal to the CNS. Without understanding the central pathways of hypertension, the baroreceptors offer the best way of controlling blood pressure without medication like lighting a flame under a thermostat to get the building colder.

Reference

J Vasc Surg 2001;34:839-45.

 

 

 

Categories
complications CTA tbad techniques TEVAR type b aortic dissection visceral malperfusion

Reversing paralysis with a bypass

Dissection CTA

The patient is middle aged and had a type B thoracic aortic dissection (TBAD) as a consequence of recreational substances that acutely raised his blood pressure. At the outside hospital, he had a CTA showing the dissection extending from his left subclavian artery and causing occlusion of his superior mesenteric artery (SMA). He developed abdominal pain and was swiftly transported to our acute aortic syndrome unit. He was taken to the operating room and underwent a TEVAR of the dissection and stenting of his SMA -this is similar to other cases I have discussed in prior posts so I am omitting the technical details. The stent covered the left subclavian artery origin to exclude the origin of the dissection. The stent was extended to the distal thoracic aorta but did not go to the celiac origin. 

TBAD post stent

Post procedure, his lactate never rose and he was maintained on the usual post procedure protocol of keeping MAP’s (mean arterial pressure) above 80mmHg. His left subclavian artery was covered but I do not routinely bypass, especially when the left vertebral artery is at least equal in size to the contralateral one. I don’t often place spinal drains for urgent/emergent cases particularly in patients who have never had infrarenal aortic surgery and patent hypogastric arteries. He was kept sedated overnight and awoke in the morning unable to move his legs to command. He had no pain sensation up to his umbilicus.

A spinal drain was emergently placed and his blood pressure was raised to MAPs of 90+, but these failed to reverse his paralysis. After discussion among my world class partners, I chose to take the patient back for a carotid subclavian bypass which was done through a single incision with a dacron bypass graft.

Carotid subclavian bypass CTA

His paralysis resolved. He was discharged home, ambulating without assistance. Spinal cord complications are reported to occur between 1-5 percent of patients undergoing TEVAR for complicated TBAD. They were seen in 2 of 72 patients in the TEVAR arm of the INSTEAD trial (Circulation, 2009 vol. 120(25) pp. 2519-28), and was permanent in 1. While there are some who routinely place prophylactic drains, it is unclear to me that they have a significant effect if placed unselectively. I will place a Preop drain in the instance of infra renal graft, hypogastric arterial occlusive disease. In the instance of a dominant left vertebral, I will perform concomitant bypass, but just as often not. This is a gratifying and rare outcome of paralysis reversed with a carotid subclavian bypass when spinal drain and permissive hypertension did not.